2001: A Space Odyssey |
An Aesthetic Cleansing
I just cringe when I hear a designer or architect say they are after a 'clean' look. What does a 'clean' look mean anyway? After all I think very few of us would prefer a 'dirty, unclean' look! 'Clean' is code for a sparse, minimalist design bereft of craft, cleansed of ornament, devoid of the polluting evidence of the human touch. A product of industry, possible only with the precision of the machine. We can practically place a date for when this pogrom against craftmanship began in earnest, January 21st 1910, with Adolph Loos' infamous lecture "Ornament and Crime". Ornament and craft were condemned as unevolved and degenerate relics of a primitive past. A self-proclaimed liberator of the craftsman, Adolf claimed their employ by the privileged was abusive and immoral. A progressive society would free them of their toil:
"We have out-grown ornament, we have struggled through to a state without ornament. Behold, the time is at hand, fulfilment awaits us. Soon the streets of the cities will glow like white walls! Like Zion, the Holy City, the capital of heaven. It is then that fulfilment will have come.” - Adolf Loos
The foretold aesthetic cleansing arrived, carried to its logical fulfillment. The former craftsman freed from his toil, liberated from his art could now slave as a laborer in the factories supplying the materials of industry or assembling them as a "mechanic" in the field.
A School, a Style, and the Rise of the Machine for Living
Bauhaus Dormitory |
The early efforts of the Bauhaus laid the grounds for an "International Style" unveiled in 1932 at the Museum for Modern Art in Manhattan, NY. What made the this style "international"? It certainly did not embrace the millennia of accumulated cultural traditions of many nations and peoples from across the globe. Commonly held among those various humanistic traditions, man had always been held as the subject of architectural design, the building was to be the objective reality, an outward expression reflecting his inner, spiritual nature. In stark contrast, the International Style enforced the complete extinguishment of any lingering artifacts of human culture, employing a complete reversal of the traditional thought process of design. The new doctrine dictated that "Form" was to follow only practical "Functions". The building and the attendant practical efficiencies of construction usurped the position of subject, placing people as just one amongst many objects such as chairs, toilets, stairs etc. populating the structure. The International Style might have been more appropriately called the Extranational Style, it reflected an aesthetic beyond the cultural influence of any nation or culture. It was the first step towards a new architecture, a Utopian architecture of "no place" in particular.
Drywall Factory |
Progress and Propaganda, The Freedom of Limited Choice
Proposed Clemson Architectural Center Charleston, SC |
Tianjin EcoCity Ecology Museum. Courtesy Steven Holl Architects |
Interested in more content on a Philosophy of Craft?
Please visit my YouTube channel: A Craftsman's PhilosophyContributed by Patrick Webb
Bravo Patrick!
ReplyDeleteThe Brave New World seems a cheerless place.
Nice Blog..
ReplyDeleteDesign build
More work for us less retentive folk when they come round to that alien concept of texture and colour;)
ReplyDeletei'll say it...modern architecture leaves me feeling cold or maybe that should be clean...don't much care for it, personally or professionally.
ReplyDeleteOn seeing the latest proposal for part of the waterfront in VA/WASHDC, I commented "Oh Great, another group of square boxes, whatever happened to CHARM?"
ReplyDeleteWorse yet when one of these progressive architects is let loose on an existing historic building. For example, Richard Meier in 1989 did his best to erase and eradicate the Barnum Museum in Bridgeport, CT.
ReplyDeleteAgree whole-heartedly; modern architecture has no soul. At least this group understands the historic preservation and traditional craftsmanship are truly green and sustainable .
ReplyDeleteWell argued. You might find my blog on the place-killing effect of regulation interesting. http://philipabenton.wordpress.com/
ReplyDeleteI did indeed Philip, read every post. The connections between industry, regulation and the degradation of culture of which architecture is a visible symbol are hardly tenuous.
ReplyDeleteIt looks like a weapon.
ReplyDeleteIn May, I led a walk for the Jane's Walk weekend in New York City on the wonder and richness of building ornament near Bowling Green in Lower Manhattan. I can imagine that those who went on this walk, as well as many others in New York, would relate so much to your essay. Such shiny, soulless buildings are threatening the real "somewhere" of so many New York neighborhoods and elsewhere globally.
ReplyDeleteBecause your essay resonated so much, I featured it as part of a post this week on Mindfulwalker.com, my New York-based blog on walking experiences and mindfulness of architecture, nature, and history. Thought you'd want to see it.
http://www.mindfulwalker.com/beyond-gotham/july-notes-daylight-towers-prison-ships
Thank you, and here's to a restoration of life-filled buildings that honor the soul, craft, tradition, and culture of people and places.
Warmly
Susan DeMark
Hello Susan,
ReplyDeleteThank you for your comment. I'm glad it led me to your blog!
Your local, Gotham insights of my article were wonderfully expressed.
Best Regards,
Patrick
Leeds, UK, is a good example of this. Lots of 'signature' buildings replaced the ordinary buildings that once lined its streets (with their countless little details and denser rhythm) and became soulless in the process. I'm sure it was once a fine city: barring a few streets in the very centre it's not a nice place to be, however clean they keep the streets.
ReplyDeleteSame feeling I get when I look at the exalted "mid-century" interiors: how do humans fit in here? At least the Eames photographed their houses with people in them.
ReplyDelete